Razer/Laptops

Razer Blade 16 - QHD+ 240 Hz OLED - GeForce RTX 5090 - Black

US · RZ09-05819EN4-R3U1

Gaming
Exact configurationRZ09-05819EN4-R3U1
The hardware

Full Specifications

Every published specification, grouped by category. Select a heading to collapse.

Performance — CPU / GPU▾
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

GraphicsNVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5090 Laptop GPU 24 GB GDDR7 Up to 165 W TGP (140 W + 25 W Dynamic Boost)
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Memory & Storage▾
Installed RAM32GB (32GB soldered)
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

View RAM layout source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

Installed RAM modules stated for the exact product or selected build

View RAM stick count source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

Installed RAM modules stated for the exact product or selected build

Total storage2 TB
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Display▾
Screen technologyUnpublished
Size16 in
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Resolution2560x1600 px
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Refresh rate240 Hz
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Battery & Power▾
Battery capacity90 Wh
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Power supply280 W AC Adapter, Output: 20 V DC, 12.5 A, 250 W, Input: 100-240 V AC, 50 / 60 Hz universal
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Connectivity▾
Ports1 x 3.5 mm Combo Audio Jack 1 x HDMI 2.1 FRL 3 x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A 1 x Thunderbolt™ 5 - Supports DisplayPort™ / power delivery 1 x Thunderbolt™ 4 - Supports DisplayPort™ / power delivery 1 x card reader (SD) (UHS-II, 312 MB/s)
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Wireless & networkingWi-Fi 7(802.11be) (Triple band) 2*2 + Bluetooth® 6.0 Wireless Card
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Build & Physical▾
Weight2140 g
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Dimensions14.9 mm ~ 17.4 mm x 250.5 mm x 355 mm 0.59" ~ 0.69" x 9.86" x 13.98"
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Software & Bundle▾
Operating systemWindows 11 Home
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Included bundleRazer Blade 16, power adapter & regional power cord, micro-fiber cleaning cloth, Important Product Information Guide
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

exact Razer US SKU specification table and selector; dual-mode screens use highest-resolution mode with its paired refresh rate

Motherboard & Memory Expansion▾
Motherboard modelUnpublished
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

Unpublished: no unambiguous exact-device manufacturer specification

Total RAM slotsUnpublished
Source & observationView specification source ↗

Observed 2026-09-23T20:20:15.347372+00:00

Unpublished: no unambiguous exact-device manufacturer specification

Independent testing

Benchmarks & Reviews

10 results from other configurations · 1 written review
Geekbench 6.7 Multi-Core16,903 pointsNotebookcheck · Other configurationTest detailsHide details

Speed on short tasks using several processor cores, such as compressing files and processing photos.

Higher is better
Test conditions
Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained
Test version
Geekbench 6.7
Published
2026-05-27
Measurement date
Unpublished
Reviewed setup
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Configuration match
Same component/pair in another configuration. Potential only; target realization unmeasured. Unknown memory_topology Unknown thermal_mode Unknown operating_point Noncritical differences: storage_gb, region
Confidence
Moderate
Limitations
Measurement date unpublished · Sample origin unpublished · Pair/component fallback; target realization unmeasured
Source location
Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core; reviewed-device row: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
View source measurement ↗
Geekbench 6.7 Single-Core2,886 pointsNotebookcheck · Other configurationTest detailsHide details

Speed on short tasks using one processor core, such as parts of web browsing and everyday apps.

Higher is better
Test conditions
Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained
Test version
Geekbench 6.7
Published
2026-05-27
Measurement date
Unpublished
Reviewed setup
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Configuration match
Same component/pair in another configuration. Potential only; target realization unmeasured. Unknown memory_topology Unknown thermal_mode Unknown operating_point Noncritical differences: storage_gb, region
Confidence
Moderate
Limitations
Measurement date unpublished · Sample origin unpublished · Pair/component fallback; target realization unmeasured
Source location
Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core; reviewed-device row: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
View source measurement ↗
Cyberpunk 2077139.5 fpsNotebookcheck · Other configurationTest detailsHide details

Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.

Higher is better
Test conditions
1920 × 1080 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained
Test version
Cyberpunk 2077
Published
2026-05-27
Measurement date
Unpublished
Reviewed setup
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Configuration match
Same component/pair in another configuration. Potential only; target realization unmeasured. Unknown memory_topology Unknown thermal_mode Unknown operating_point Noncritical differences: storage_gb, region
Confidence
Moderate
Limitations
Measurement date unpublished · Sample origin unpublished · Frame-generation setting unpublished · Pair/component fallback; target realization unmeasured
Source location
Cyberpunk 2077 / 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off); reviewed-device row: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
View source measurement ↗

Compare tests with the same version and settings. Expand each test for the measured setup and limitations.

Results marked “Other configuration” use a different device or configuration. This configuration may perform differently.

Expand benchmarksCollapse benchmarksComparison charts, test conditions & full reviews

Benchmarks & Reviews

Published test results and reviewer comments.

10 results from other configurations1 written review

Results marked “Other configuration” come from devices with a matching processor or graphics chip. This configuration may perform differently.

Compare tests with the same version and settings.

Gaming

Frames per second (fps) measure how many images a game shows each second. Higher usually feels smoother.

  • 30 fpsBasic target
  • 60 fpsSmooth target
  • 120 fpsHigh refresh target
These are general guides. Slowdowns and uneven frame timing also affect how a game feels.

Cyberpunk 2077

Higher is better

1920 × 1080 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported

  1. Other configuration139.5 fps

Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.

Baldur's Gate 3

Higher is better

2560 × 1440 · Ultra + Quality DLSS preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported

  1. Other configuration199.8 fps

Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.

Baldur's Gate 3

Higher is better

2560 × 1440 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported

  1. Other configuration157.3 fps

Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.

Baldur's Gate 3

Higher is better

1920 × 1080 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported

  1. Other configuration202 fps

Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.

Cyberpunk 2077

Higher is better

2560 × 1440 · Ultra DLSS4 quality no FG preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation off

  1. Other configuration116.6 fps

Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.

Cyberpunk 2077

Higher is better

2560 × 1440 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported

  1. Other configuration105.8 fps

Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.

Gaming test results and sources
TestResultTest conditionsSource
Cyberpunk 2077Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better139.5 fpsOther configuration

1920 × 1080 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Baldur's Gate 3Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better199.8 fpsOther configuration

2560 × 1440 · Ultra + Quality DLSS preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Baldur's Gate 3Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better157.3 fpsOther configuration

2560 × 1440 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Baldur's Gate 3Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better202 fpsOther configuration

1920 × 1080 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Cyberpunk 2077Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better116.6 fpsOther configuration

2560 × 1440 · Ultra DLSS4 quality no FG preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation off · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Cyberpunk 2077Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better105.8 fpsOther configuration

2560 × 1440 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27

Processor

Geekbench 6.7 Multi-Core

Higher is better

Speed on short tasks using several processor cores, such as compressing files and processing photos. Compared with 6 reviewed laptops in this comparison.

Middle of these 6: 16,883.5 points

Memory, cooling and operating system versions differ between these reviewed devices. This small set does not describe the whole market. Notebookcheck comparison ↗

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Higher is better

Rendering speed using all processor cores. Compared with 6 reviewed laptops in this comparison.

Middle of these 6: 20,656.5 points

Memory, cooling and operating system versions differ between these reviewed devices. This small set does not describe the whole market. Notebookcheck comparison ↗

Processor test results and sources
TestResultTest conditionsSource
Geekbench 6.7 Multi-CoreSpeed on short tasks using several processor cores, such as compressing files and processing photos.Higher is better16,903 pointsOther configuration

Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Geekbench 6.7 Single-CoreSpeed on short tasks using one processor core, such as parts of web browsing and everyday apps.Higher is better2,886 pointsOther configuration

Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Cinebench R23 Multi CoreRendering speed using all processor cores.Higher is better20,750 pointsOther configuration

Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27
Cinebench R23 Single CoreRendering speed using one processor core.Higher is better2,087 pointsOther configuration

Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 85 W short burst; 55 W sustained

Reviewed setup: Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Blade 16 Series) · Intel Core Ultra 9 386H · NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop · 32 GB RAM
Notebookcheck ↗2026-05-27

Read the reviews

More benchmarks and reviews →

Configuration matching & limitations

Notebookcheck: Model review. Results describe the tested hardware; unspecified power modes and RAM topology do not establish an exact target test.

gaming pilot

cpu
Reviewer comments
gpu
Not measured
gaming
Reviewer comments

performance pilot

cpu
Reviewer comments
gpu
Not measured
gaming
Reviewer comments
sustained
Not measured

whole device

cpu
Reviewer comments
gpu
Not measured
gaming
Reviewer comments
sustained
Not measured
noise
Not measured
battery
Not measured
display
Not measured
build
Not measured

An overall buying score is unavailable. The available measurements do not cover every aspect of the device.

Compare Configurations

Other laptops in the catalog. No ranking is implied.