Rectangle Conn, 200W AC Adapter, Output: 20V DC, 10A, 200W, Input: 100-240V AC, 50/60Hz universal*Whether a charger is included varies according to country, region and model. Please check with your local ASUS retailer for details.Source & observationView specification source ↗
Observed 2026-10-05T21:00:44.301284+00:00
validated manufacturer specification
Connectivity▾
Ports
1x 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack2x Type-C USB 4 with support for DisplayPort™ / power delivery (data speed up to 40Gbps)1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (data speed up to 10Gbps)1x card reader (microSD) (UHS-II)Support XG Mobile GC34Source & observationView specification source ↗
Observed 2026-10-05T21:00:44.301284+00:00
validated manufacturer specification
Wireless & networking
Wi-Fi 7(802.11be) (Triple band) 2*2 + Bluetooth® 5.4 Wireless Card (*Bluetooth® version may change with OS version different.)Source & observationView specification source ↗
Same component/pair in another configuration. Potential only; target realization unmeasured. Unknown memory_topology Unknown thermal_mode Unknown operating_point Noncritical differences: storage_gb, region
Confidence
Moderate
Limitations
Historical evidence; current firmware not retested · Measurement date unpublished · Sample origin unpublished · Pair/component fallback; target realization unmeasured
Source location
Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core; reviewed-device row: Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073WAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Same component/pair in another configuration. Potential only; target realization unmeasured. Unknown memory_topology Unknown thermal_mode Unknown operating_point Noncritical differences: storage_gb, region
Confidence
Moderate
Limitations
Historical evidence; current firmware not retested · Measurement date unpublished · Sample origin unpublished · Pair/component fallback; target realization unmeasured
Source location
Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core; reviewed-device row: Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073WAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Cyberpunk 207775.6 fpsNotebookcheck · Other configurationTest detailsHide details⌄
Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.
Higher is better
Test conditions
1920 × 1080 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained
Same component/pair in another configuration. Potential only; target realization unmeasured. Unknown memory_topology Unknown thermal_mode Unknown operating_point Noncritical differences: storage_gb, region
Confidence
Moderate
Limitations
Historical evidence; current firmware not retested · Measurement date unpublished · Sample origin unpublished · Frame-generation setting unpublished · Pair/component fallback; target realization unmeasured
Results marked “Other configuration” come from devices with a matching processor or graphics chip. This configuration may perform differently.
Compare tests with the same version and settings.
Gaming
Frames per second (fps) measure how many images a game shows each second. Higher usually feels smoother.
30 fpsBasic target
60 fpsSmooth target
120 fpsHigh refresh target
These are general guides. Slowdowns and uneven frame timing also affect how a game feels.
Cyberpunk 2077
Higher is better
1920 × 1080 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported
Other configuration75.6 fps
03060120
Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.
Baldur's Gate 3
Higher is better
2560 × 1440 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported
Other configuration55.2 fps
03060120
Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.
Baldur's Gate 3
Higher is better
1920 × 1080 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported
Other configuration85.3 fps
03060120
Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.
Cyberpunk 2077
Higher is better
2560 × 1440 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported
Other configuration46.4 fps
03060120
Reported fps · Notebookcheck ↗ · This configuration has no measured result for this test.
Gaming test results and sources
Test
Result
Test conditions
Source
Cyberpunk 2077Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better
75.6 fpsOther configuration
1920 × 1080 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained
Baldur's Gate 3Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better
55.2 fpsOther configuration
2560 × 1440 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained
Baldur's Gate 3Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better
85.3 fpsOther configuration
1920 × 1080 · Ultra AA:T preset · See preset conditions · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained
Cyberpunk 2077Frames shown each second. A higher average usually looks smoother, but does not show every slowdown.Higher is better
46.4 fpsOther configuration
2560 × 1440 · Ultra (FSR off) preset · FSR off · Frame generation not reported · Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Game version Not reported · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained
Speed on short tasks using several processor cores, such as compressing files and processing photos. Compared with 4 reviewed tablets in this comparison.
Memory, cooling and operating system versions differ between these reviewed devices. This small set does not describe the whole market. Notebookcheck comparison ↗
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Higher is better
Rendering speed using all processor cores. Compared with 4 reviewed tablets in this comparison.
Memory, cooling and operating system versions differ between these reviewed devices. This small set does not describe the whole market. Notebookcheck comparison ↗
Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
Higher is better
Rendering speed using all processor cores. Compared with 2 reviewed tablets in this comparison.
Memory, cooling and operating system versions differ between these reviewed devices. This small set does not describe the whole market. Notebookcheck comparison ↗
Processor test results and sources
Test
Result
Test conditions
Source
Geekbench 6.7 Multi-CoreSpeed on short tasks using several processor cores, such as compressing files and processing photos.Higher is better
21,269 pointsOther configuration
Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained
3DMark Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedGraphics speed in a demanding fixed 3D scene, rendered off screen. This score is not a game frame rate.Higher is better
19,615 pointsOther configuration
Review settings; named power mode not reported · Microsoft Windows 11 Home · Review's processor limits: 86 W short burst; 70 W sustained